Dashy Dash

The Challenge
Restaurants face an uneven playing field: suppliers hold pricing power, and restaurants rarely know if they’re getting fair prices. Our goal was to break supplier opacity by helping restaurants:
- Track and archive purchase invoices 
- Identify savings opportunities across produce 
- Benchmark prices with nearby restaurants 
- Get smarter with their purchasing decisions 
The biggest design challenge: building a data-heavy product that remains simple, intuitive, and fast for busy restaurant owners.
Research & Discovery
- Stakeholder interviews: Over 15 restaurant owners across California interviewed to identify key pain points - especially around invoicing, overpaying, and lack of transparency. 
- Journey mapping: Documented current-state workflows around ordering and invoice storage. 
- Prototype testing: Low- to high-fidelity prototypes were tested with users, including time-on-task and usability scoring. 
- Quant testing: Post-launch, we tracked feature usage rates, task success, and time-to-value. 
- Qual testing: Observed first-time users completing tasks, collecting friction points and language confusion. 
Key insight: Users didn’t want raw analytics - they wanted clarity and contextual insights that tell them what to do.
Design Process & Iterations
Our guiding principle: “Make complexity digestible.”
Phase 1: Invoice Digitization & Analytics
- Built flows to scan, store, and tag invoices 
- Created invoice filtering, labeling, and search functionality 
- Designed weekly/monthly spending dashboards for high-level visibility 
- Developed trend views for price changes across tracked SKUs 
Phase 2: Benchmarking 2.0
This was the turning point.
- Designed the Benchmarking feature, allowing restaurants to anonymously compare their item-level prices with other users in the same geography. 
- Built data visualizations showing where users overpaid/underpaid on produce. 
- Designed supplier recommendation flows that suggested vendors with better deals. 
"It felt like I was finally in control of what I pay my suppliers."
Early adopter
#
Impact
- +40% adoption of Benchmarking feature within first 60 days 
- Avg. cost savings of 12–18% reported by pilot users within 3 months 
- Reduced invoice search time by 70% through tagging and smart filters 
- Positive qualitative feedback from 80% of test users citing “clarity,” “control,” and “fairness” 
Key Learnings
- Designing for decisions, not dashboards: Restaurants didn’t want raw data - they wanted direct insights: "You're overpaying on tomatoes by $0.20/lb - switch suppliers." 
- Data trust matters: Visualizing benchmarks required transparency on how comparisons were made, without exposing other businesses. 
- Balance abstraction with detail: The UI needed to surface just enough to nudge action, without overwhelming users.